- Commissioner’s statement on Ventura, Marte
- Ronnie O’Sullivan: Masters champion ‘felt so vulnerable’ in final
- Arron Fletcher Wins 2017 WSOP International Circuit Marrakech Main Event ($140,224)
- Smith challenges Warner to go big in India
- Moncada No. 1 on MLB Pipeline’s Top 10 2B Prospects list
- Braves land 2 on MLB Pipeline’s Top 10 2B Prospects list
- Kingery makes MLB Pipeline’s Top 10 2B Prospects list
- New Zealand wrap up 2-0 after Bangladesh implosion
- Mathews, Pradeep, Gunathilaka to return to Sri Lanka
- Elliott hopes for rain for Poli
Concussion deal critics seek appeals court review
- Updated: April 28, 2016
3:54 PM ET
PHILADELPHIA — Critics of the proposed $1 billion settlement of NFL concussion claims want a full U.S. appeals court in Philadelphia to review a recent decision that upheld the deal.
The challengers believe lead players’ lawyers negotiated away compensation for the key complaint in the original lawsuit, a brain disease known as chronic traumatic encephalopathy, because the science is still being developed.
In their appeal Thursday, they said the lead players’ lawyers traded away the CTE issue in exchange for higher awards for less common problems, such as Parkinson’s disease and dementia.
“Rather than … deleting the CTE claims from the complaint, however, class counsel proceeded to settle those claims for no compensation, while obtaining recovery for other, rarer, conditions that are not exclusively associated with head …
continue reading in source espn.go.com