BCCI set for another Supreme Court hearing

1480837284575

On December 5, the Supreme Court of India will reconvene to address the long-standing impasse between the BCCI and the Lodha Committee. Since July 18, when it approved a majority of the recommendations proposed by the Lodha Committee for best practices in the BCCI and its state associations, the court has directed the Indian board to implement them. The BCCI, though, has steadily resisted implementing most of the recommendations.

Despite finding “substance” in the Lodha Committee’s claim of the BCCI’s “intransigence”, however, the court opted to exercise patience. It reserved its order on “superseding” the BCCI’s office bearers with a panel of administrators, as was recommended by the committee in September.

Instead, the court gave the BCCI time to prove it would convince the states to adopt the approved recommendations in total. But at three meetings conducted by the BCCI since October, including two special general meetings (SGMs), the state associations remained steadfast in their defiance of certain recommendations.

Consequently, the Lodha Committee, in its latest status report, asked the court for the second time to remove all ineligible office bearers at the BCCI and state levels, and to appoint an “observer” to oversee the board’s business deals.

Click here for the key points of the case till October. The following is a synopsis of the hearings since then, and the key questions before the court when it reconvenes on Monday.

What did the court state in its previous order?On October 21, the court passed an interim order asking the BCCI to “cease and desist” from disbursing funds to state associations until the association gave a written resolution that it would adopt all the recommendations approved by the court.

The court also asked BCCI president Anurag Thakur and secretary Ajay Shirke to meet the Lodha committee within two weeks from the date of that order and submit an “affidavit of compliance”, elaborating on the recommendations already implemented by the BCCI and what it had done to persuade the state associations to adopt the remaining recommendations.

Have the states submitted written undertakings? Only the Hyderabad …

continue reading in source www.espncricinfo.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *