- Commissioner’s statement on Ventura, Marte
- Ronnie O’Sullivan: Masters champion ‘felt so vulnerable’ in final
- Arron Fletcher Wins 2017 WSOP International Circuit Marrakech Main Event ($140,224)
- Smith challenges Warner to go big in India
- Moncada No. 1 on MLB Pipeline’s Top 10 2B Prospects list
- Braves land 2 on MLB Pipeline’s Top 10 2B Prospects list
- Kingery makes MLB Pipeline’s Top 10 2B Prospects list
- New Zealand wrap up 2-0 after Bangladesh implosion
- Mathews, Pradeep, Gunathilaka to return to Sri Lanka
- Elliott hopes for rain for Poli
What is English cricket arguing over?
- Updated: September 13, 2016
After months – years, even – of discussions, the chairmen and chief executives of the 18 first-class counties and the MCC meet at Lord’s on Wednesday to discuss the options for the future of the domestic T20 competition, with the ECB executive looking by “a consensus” by the time ends. Though five options were presented to the counties, two scenarios (Option 2 and Option 4) have emerged as the most likely.
Option 2 Two divisions of nine teams with three promoted and relegated each year. Broadcasters to focus on top division.
For
Ensures all 18 counties remain involved.
Ensures more geographic spread of competition.
Retains successful ‘appointment to view’ formula.
Retains integrity of County Championship.
Promotion and relegation offers added context and drama.
Builds on growth of current event, for which audiences have grown by 63% since 2012.
Ensures domestic T20 cricket remains relevant in smaller cities and towns where it has proved most popular
Allows broadcasters to focus on top division to ensure clearer narrative for viewers less familiar with the game.
Played through the second two-thirds of the season, so minimises damage of poor spell of weather.
Does not demand too much of spectators’ time or money in short period.
Against
Some counties feel that all 18 should have the opportunity to win every year.
Not as popular among broadcasters so therefore offers to bring in less money. It has been valued at around £30m less attractive to broadcasters, though that number is disputed.
Would continue difficulty of attracting …
